Trek road bikes have always been a popular brand in road bike racing. Following the first generation of the Trek 2000 road bike in 1999, there were different versions of the Trek 2000 in 2000, 2001, 2002, and 2003.
The Trek 2000, which was entirely hand-built, also competed in a few races at the time. This is a comprehensive review of the Trek 2000 road bike. Is the star model still a good road bike after 15 years?
I recently purchased a used Trek road bike.After a period of riding，We gained some practical experience.
Below we’ll take a look at the Trek 2000’s road performance, as well as its track performance, key components and specs, and its other versions. Finally, we also compare some of the road bikes for sale today to the Trek 2000.
If you’re on a budget, you can check out our Top 9 Best Road Bikes Under 500 [Review] to choose the best road bike.
Road Performance
You’d be correct if you expected more from this “old” road bike. Standard 700C tires, slim 25C tires for fast tarmac speeds. The carbon fiber fork is extremely strong and unbreakable.
Although the road edge section does not provide much shock absorption, it has a very high power transmission ratio when accelerating the ride. On the uphill section of the road, the 3X9 drivetrain makes the rider feel very comfortable.
The steep head tube angle forces the rider out of their comfort zone on downhills and necessitates a different acceleration position to gain a better grip on balance. It takes some getting used to.
It’s a little uncomfortable, but the Trek 2000 is still a good choice when the corner isn’t violent, and it’s still a good choice if you live in the neighborhood.
Track Performance
Even with an expensive race-specific road bike, if it’s just a flat road ride. When compared to the Trek 2000, the difference is only noticeable on longer rides.
On hill rides, the steep head tube angle of the Trek 2000 allows the rider to climb faster. Going downhill increases traction by compressing the body and lowering the center of gravity.
Especially the park’s plastic roads, which are one of my favorite places to ride. The Trek 2000 has a good power transfer ratio and 27 different speeds, allowing the rider to get used to it over a longer period of time, making it a mid-range road bike rather than a pure entry-level road bike.
The track performance is 4.5 out of 5 and is comparable to modern road bikes in the same price range.
Trek 2000 main components and specifications
Aluminum Frame
One of the features that distinguish the Trek 2000 bike as an entry-level race road bike is the use of Alpha SL aluminum.
The cost of construction is slightly higher than that of a steel frame, but it is lighter in weight. It maintains the frame’s rigidity.
The body is blue/silver. Standard Trek insignia. The head tube angle is aggressive.
The Trek 2000 frame design is a very classic race-type frame that can be used for not only road racing but also some triathlons.
Front Fork
The Trek 2000 has a Bontrager Race full carbon fork, which contributes significantly to the Trek 2000’s weight savings.
It is well known that the cheaper the bike, the heavier it is, and the Trek 2000 frame design is still very traditional compared to modern road bikes, with no quick-release hubs, a stiff thru-axle, and a stable front wheel for fast travel on flat roads during fast rides.
3X9 drivetrain
The Trek 2000’s 3X9 flywheel has a much higher gear count for flat road riding than the current 2X flywheel. And having more gears means having more gearing options.
This is fantastic for flat tracks. However, if you’re a beginner, having more gears means having a faster shift reaction time. And the three chainrings in the front section aren’t ideal for time trials.
Of course, for casual riding, the 3X9 drivetrain is a godsend, and who can resist a road bike with more gears?
700Cx25C Tires
The 700 x 25c Bontrager Select is a great tool for accelerated riding despite its lack of tread.
When riding on the road, it can accelerate the ride and accommodate up to 28C rims, which are one of the accessories that can be replaced if you want a more comfortable ride.
There is no attempt to achieve extreme lightness in tire weight, and some riders may prefer the thinner 23C tires, but that will be a great test of your riding skills.
It is extremely easy to fall down when going through corners quickly without enough sidewall, especially when going through corners quickly.
However, the thin tires of the 23C appeal to me for the challenge of faster riding speeds.
Other versions of Trek 2000
Trek 2000 WSD
The Trek 2000 WSD is the perfect road bike for women riders. The 2000 version of the 2000 WSD still had a 3X8 drivetrain.
The 2000 version of the WSD had a 3X8 drivetrain, but the 2001 and later Trek 2000 WSDs all had a 3X9 drivetrain.
The paint colors were light blue and dark blue. The aluminum micro-adjusted seat post is also different from the Trek 2000.
2006 Trek 2000
The number of rear gears has been increased by 10 speeds, but the other changes are not too big.
Trek 2000 Specs
| Components | Data |
| Frame | Alpha™ SL Aluminum. Superlight, large-diameter tubing for exceptional durability and efficient power transfer. |
| Fork | Bontrager Race, OCLV Carbon, 1-1/8″ aluminum steerer tube, aluminum crown |
| Sizes | 52cm, 54cm, 56cm, 58cm, 60cm, 63cm |
| Wheels | Matrix Aurora, welded, machined sidewall rims; Shimano Tiagra, 32h hubs; 14G stainless spokes |
| Shifters | Shimano 105 |
| Front derailleur | Shimano Tiagra |
| Rear derailleur | Shimano 105 |
| Crank | Shimano 105 52/42/30 |
| Cassette | Shimano HG-50 12-25, 9spd |
| Pedals | Shimano M515, clipless |
| Saddle | Trek CRZ+ Road |
| Seatpost | Alloy micro-adjust |
| Handlebar | Alloy road w/ergo bend |
| Stem | Alloy AHS, 17Ëš |
| Headset | AHS 1-1/8″ semi cartridge, sealed |
| Brakeset | w/ levers |
| Colours | Bright Silver |
Trek 2000: What do we like?
- Quality Shimano accessories that will support the bike for years of use
- Durable, maintenance-free aluminum frame
- Carbon brazed dimensional fork
- Standard 700C tires for faster riding
- Multiple frame sizes to fit riders of all heights
What we don’t like?
- Hard saddle
- Pedals need to be upgraded to ride faster
Related Questions
- How much does the Trek 2000 weigh?
19.3 lbs, which is already relatively light for a road bike with an aluminum frame.
- How much does the Trek 2000 cost?
The price of the Trek 2000 varies from version to version. However, the official guide price is $1090-$1500.
- What is the price of a used Trek 2000 bike?
If you are willing to trade in your old bike for a new one, then the price is expected to be around $120.
But at used bike length, it is expected to double. 240 USD is the selling price. This is just the data before release and can be used as a reference.
Comparison Table
| Bicycle | Frame material | Wheel size | Speed Number | Price |
| Trek Domane AL 2 | Aluminum | 28c | 16 | Click View |
| Trek Domane AL 4 Disc | carbon | 32or 35C | 20 | Click View |
| RIDLEY Fenix | Aluminum | 25c | 22 | Click View |
| Schwinn Phocus 1600 | Aluminum | 700c | 24 | Click View |
Competition
Trek Domane AL 2 vs 2000
In terms of price, aluminum frame, front, and rear rim brakes, light transmission angle, and carbon fork, the Trek Domane AL 2 is similar to the Trek 2000.
However, there is still a speed disparity. The Trek Domane AL 2 has a 2X8 drivetrain, which is not suitable for a competitive bike, and the compact body design is slightly narrower than the Trek 2000.
As a result, the Trek Domane AL 2 is well-suited to the needs of short commuter riders, which explains why they were able to reserve rack holes at the rear end of the frame, as well as front and rear mudguard mounts.
If you’re thinking about the possibility of racing, then consider the Trek Domane AL 4 Disc, which is more suitable than the Trek Domane AL 2.
But if you’re more of a fast commuter, the Trek Domane AL 2 is available at a very affordable price.
Trek Domane AL 4 Disc vs Trek 2000
Although the Trek Domane AL 4 Disc road bike is a little more expensive to purchase, the Trek Domane AL 4 Disc is better for the rider in terms of the quality of its accessories, and a more sensible way of braking when it comes to racing.
The Trek Domane AL 4 Disc is still made of aluminum, but the overall frame weighs about 4 pounds more than the Trek 2000, making it suitable for endurance races and shorter distances.
The 2X10 drivetrain will give riders a wide enough shift range, and while there is a large flywheel gap compared to the Trek 2000, I don’t believe the 2X10 gears are insufficient. I don’t believe the gears on the 2X10 are sufficient.
Front and rear forcible hydraulic disc brakes allow for faster descents followed by quick braking, allowing you to gain valuable time on downhill trails and corners.
If you enjoy gravel sections and trail riding, you’ll be pleased with the Trek Domane AL 4 Disc’s configuration.
RIDLEY Fenix Road Bike vs Trek 2000
The RIDLEY Fenix Road Bike is the strongest competitor to the Trek 2000 in the list.
A competitive road bike that combines sports aesthetics and cycling, the Gravel Road Bike will see the light of day.
If you own the RIDLEY Fenix you get, carbon fiber frame, carbon fiber fork, 2X11 drivetrain, hydraulic disc brakes, and Vittoria Rubino Pro Tires to keep you rolling on gravel roads.
The RIDLEY Fenix Road Bike has a lighter weight than 2000: around 17 pounds, a clean and tidy look, a steep fork, and the climbing ability to crush the Trek 2000. These are what make the RIDLEY Fenix Road Bike a worthy all-around carbon racing and training bike.
The price point is medium in competitive bikes, not extremely light, but all the performance is up to about 95% of a pro-level road bike, making it a very cost-effective competitive bike.
Schwinn Phocus 1600 vs Trek 2000
The Schwinn Phocus 1600, which is half the price of the Trek 2000, does not appear to satisfy competitive riders.
The Schwinn Phocus 1600 is an aluminum frame with a carbon fiber fork, but it’s a great alternative to the Trek 2000 for first-time riders looking for a more affordable road bike.
This looks a lot like the Trek 2000. The gearing, however, has been compromised, with a 2X8 drivetrain and no it wide-range gearing.
As a result, the Schwinn Phocus 1600 is only available to riders who commute to ride or go out for exercise.
Final Verdict
With its lightweight, durable aluminum frame and ultra-wide gear range, the Trek 2000 is still a mid-range race road bike that has a lot to offer compared to modern new road bikes.
But if you’re not looking for a used road bike, consider the options in our comparison table.
The Trek 2000, with a stable ride and a configuration that allows for fast and accelerated riding, ultimately we think it’s a good road bike and worth buying.
Learn more:
Is The Trek 1000 A Good Road Bike? [Trek 1000 Review]
Is The Trek 1200 A Good Road Bike? [Review]
Is The Trek 1.2 A Good Road Bike? [Review]
