Tommaso Imola Review
- Price: $900
- Frame: Aluminum
- Tires: Kenda K152 700×25
- Gear: 3×8
What we like about it: The TOMMASO ULTRACOMPACT HANDLEBARS provide excellent handling capability and decent comfort.
What we don’t like about it: The 3×8 drivetrain is outdated, not as smooth as a single-chainring setup, and prone to chain drops.
Rating: (4.6/5)
My friend Bob has recently taken a keen interest in bicycle racing. After watching numerous cycling race videos, he excitedly informed me that he wants to join this activity but is unsure about a suitable bike. I believe there are many like him, passionate about bike racing but struggling to find the right bicycle. I came across the Tommaso Imola, and now, during its discount season, it’s an opportunity to get it at a lower price.
Below, we’ll analyze the riding experience, main features, components, and specifications of the Tommaso Imola. In the latter part of this article, we’ll also compare it to a few of the best bike models out there. If you’re interested in more bike reviews, stay tuned with us.
Riding Experience
To thoroughly test this racing bike, I booked a flight on IHG and reserved a hotel to venture onto a suburban road in New York for a private race.
Race Riding
Starting from the starting line, I swiftly pedaled, feeling the powerful surge of the Tommaso Imola under my control. Its Tommaso 6061 SLA Aluminum frame offered a lightweight, allowing me to ride exceptionally fast toward the first uphill stretch.
During the uphill section, I adjusted the Shimano Claris R2000 (8-spd) rear derailleur and Shimano Claris R2000 (3-spd) front derailleur to the lowest gear ratios for tackling the ascent. I effortlessly pedaled, and the Tommaso Imola delivered outstanding power, maintaining a smooth climb.
After the uphill, a gradual downhill followed. I controlled the speed with the Tommaso Ultralight Alloy Compact Flat Top Bar. Given that the Shimano Claris Brake Calipers didn’t provide sustained braking, I attentively surveyed the road ahead, avoiding mishaps due to excessive speed. I intermittently braked to ensure a longer reaction time at high speeds.
As I reached the bends, I sat on the WTB Volt saddle, adjusting my center of gravity to maneuver with agility. I could feel the impressive responsiveness of the Tommaso Imola. Drawing from my extensive experience, I optimized my pace and angles for each turn, executing rapid and smooth cornering. Speed in corners is true speed, and I maintained my advantage through the bends.
Is That All?
In the race, a comfortable saddle is vital. The WTB Volt saddle is designed for speed and comfort. I felt the contour shape providing excellent support for my sit bones. The central depression relieved pressure on sensitive areas, enabling me to focus more on the race. Additionally, the WTB Volt saddle’s base features fewer fibers, enhancing flexibility. I managed extended rides without significant fatigue.
Furthermore, the bike is equipped with Kenda K152 tires, 25c width, perfect for road use. Whether on smooth or rough roads, I experienced exceptional performance. The rigidity and balance of the Kenda K152 wheels allowed me to ride at higher speeds and respond quickly to changes in the road surface. Climbing, descending at high speeds, or sharp turns – the wheel’s stability and precision instilled confidence and provided an edge.
Specifications
The Tommaso Imola is an exceptional racing bike, featuring the Tommaso 6061 SLA Aluminum Compact Road Frame and Tommaso SST Steel fork. Its Tommaso Ultralight Alloy Compact Flat Top Bar boasts an ergonomic design, allowing riders to comfortably grip it. The WTB Volt Saddle is lightweight and offers excellent cushioning and pressure relief zones, safeguarding sensitive areas for prolonged comfort.
Additionally, it comes equipped with the Shimano Claris R2000 (8-spd) rear derailleur and Shimano Claris R2000 (3-spd) front derailleur. While the 3×8-speed drivetrain is somewhat outdated, it still delivers decent shifting performance. The bike also features Kenda K152 700×25 tires. Crafted from durable materials, they handle various terrains without significant signs of wear. Moreover, the lightweight tires are convenient for carrying and quick replacements when needed.
Video
What do we like about it?
- The 6061 alloy frame offers an ultra-lightweight build, combining durability and corrosion resistance.
- Riders can achieve powerful handling and good comfort using TOMMASO ULTRACOMPACT HANDLEBARS.
- Tommaso’s compact frame geometry places riders in a comfortable position for extended rides.
- Currently available at a discounted price of $799.99.
What don’t we like about it?
- The 3×8 drivetrain is outdated compared to modern single-chainring setups, with less smooth shifting and a tendency for chain drops.
FAQ
- Is this bike suitable for beginners?
Both beginners and experienced riders can enjoy this bike.
- Where is this bike manufactured?
It’s designed in Italy and manufactured in Colorado.
- Can I test-ride this bike?
You can take advantage of a 14-day trial ride to make comprehensive adjustments and ensure the bike fits your ideal riding condition.
- How do I choose the right size?
The size chart is below:
These sizes are general guidelines; the best way to find your perfect fit is to try it out.
| Rider height | SIZE |
| 4’9″ – 5’2″ | XXS |
| 5’2″ – 5’6″ | XS |
| 5’6″ – 5’8″ | S |
| 5’8″ – 5’11” | M |
| 5’11” – 6’2″ | L |
| 6’2″ – 6’5″ | XL |
Specs
Build
| Frame | Tommaso 6061 SLA Aluminum Compact Road Frame |
| Fork | Tommaso SST Steel with Aluminum Steer Tube |
| Bottom Bracket | BB – ES300 |
| Headset | 1-1/8″ Threadless Integrated |
| Stem | Tommaso Ultralight Sport Series Aluminum (+/- 7°) |
| Handlebar | Tommaso Ultralight Alloy Compact Flat Top Bar |
| Saddle | WTB Volt – Tommaso Logo |
| Seatpost | Tommaso TRS Ultralight Race Series Aluminum 27.2mm |
| Pedals | Composite Flat |
Groupset
| Rear Derailleur | Shimano Claris R2000 (8-spd) |
| Front Derailleur | Shimano Claris R2000 (3-spd) |
| Crank | Shimano Claris Triple R2000 30/39/50T |
| Shifters | Shimano Claris R2000 |
| Cassette | Shimano Claris 11-28t – 8spd |
| Chain | KMC Z-72 (8spd Chain) |
| Brakes | Shimano Claris Brake Calipers |
| Brake Levers | Shimano Claris |
Wheels
| Rims | Tommaso TC-20 Wheelset – 23mm Rim – 20 Front/24 Rear Spokes |
| Tires | Kenda K152 700×25 |
Comparison Table
| Bicycles | Click view | Tires | Drivetrain | Frame Material | Groupset |
| Polygon STRATTOS S4 | Click View | PERFORMANCE TIRE 700x28C | 2 x 10 | Aluminum | Shimano Tiagra |
| Cannondale CAAD Optimo 4 | Click View | Vittoria Zaffiro, 700x25c | 2×8 | Aluminum | Shimano Claris, FSA |
| Pinnacle Laterite 2 Road Bike | Click View | Schwalbe Lugano 700x25C | 2×8 | Aluminum | Shimano Claris |
| Specialized Allez | Click View | RoadSport, 700x26mm | 2×8 | Aluminum | Shimano Claris |
Tommaso Imola vs Polygon STRATTOS S4
The Tommaso Imola comes equipped with a 3×8 drivetrain, whereas the Polygon STRATTOS S4 features a 2×10 drivetrain. The 2×10 drivetrain offers smoother operation and a wider gear range. Additionally, the Polygon STRATTOS S4 is equipped with a carbon fork, while the Tommaso Imola has an aluminum fork. Although carbon forks provide better shock absorption, they are more susceptible to breaking when subjected to side impacts. Aluminum forks don’t face this issue.
Furthermore, the Tommaso Imola can reach speeds of up to 39mph, whereas the Polygon STRATTOS S4 can only reach 36mph. Therefore, the Tommaso Imola can achieve higher speeds. Additionally, the Tommaso Imola features the more agile Kenda K152 700x25c tires. However, the Polygon STRATTOS S4 is equipped with the more stable PERFORMANCE TIRE 700x28C tires.
If you’re looking for a faster cycling experience, I would recommend the Tommaso Imola. On the other hand, if you value stability in your ride, the Polygon STRATTOS S4 would be your ideal choice.
Tommaso Imola vs Cannondale CAAD Optimo 4
The Cannondale CAAD Optimo 4 is equipped with Wellgo w/ Clip and Strap pedals and Cannondale Bar Tape, 3.5mm grips. These configurations provide convenience for riders, meaning they won’t need to spend extra time searching for suitable pedals and grips.
Additionally, the Cannondale CAAD Optimo 4 features a carbon fork that’s susceptible to breaking from the side impact, but it offers strong flexibility. In contrast, the Tommaso Imola has an aluminum fork. Moreover, the Cannondale CAAD Optimo 4 is equipped with a 2×8 drivetrain, while the Tommaso Imola features a 3×8 drivetrain. It’s worth noting that the 3×8 drivetrain is somewhat more outdated.
In summary, if you’d like to avoid spending extra time picking out pedals and grips, the Cannondale CAAD Optimo 4 can meet your needs. If you’re seeking a fork that’s less prone to breaking, the Tommaso Imola is a great fit for you.
Learn More: Is Cannondale CAADX 1 A Good Bike? [2022 Cannondale CAADX 1 Review]
Tommaso Imola vs Pinnacle Laterite 2 Road Bike
Both of these bicycles have frames made from 6061 aluminum, which is lightweight and durable. However, the Pinnacle Laterite 2 Road Bike is equipped with a carbon fork, known for its strong flexibility but also its susceptibility to breaking. Additionally, both of these bikes come with pedals, making it convenient for riders to make a purchase.
Furthermore, the Pinnacle Laterite 2 Road Bike features very clean internal cable routing. On the other hand, while the external cable routing of the Tommaso Imola is easier for maintenance, it tends to accumulate dirt during daily rides, making it less maintenance-friendly. What’s more, the Tommaso Imola is slightly cheaper than the Pinnacle Laterite 2 Road Bike.
So, if you’re looking for a clean and sleek internal cable routing design, the Pinnacle Laterite 2 Road Bike would be better suited for you. If budget is a concern, the Tommaso Imola can still meet your needs effectively.
Tommaso Imola vs Specialized Allez
The Specialized Allez comes equipped with 26mm tires, slightly wider than the 25mm tires on the Tommaso Imola, allowing for better adaptation to various road conditions. However, the Tommaso Imola offers Composite Flat pedals, providing convenience for riders. Additionally, it is nearly $200 cheaper than the Specialized Allez.
Furthermore, the Specialized Allez has a carbon fork that is susceptible to breaking from side impacts. In contrast, the aluminum fork on the Tommaso Imola lacks the flexibility of a carbon frame. Additionally, the Specialized Allez features cleaner internal cable routing, remaining less dirty after extended rides. While the external cable routing of the Tommaso Imola is easier for maintenance, it’s not as easy to keep in good condition.
In conclusion, if you’re looking for wider tires, I would recommend purchasing the Specialized Allez. If you want a bike equipped with pedals, the Tommaso Imola would be the better choice.
Summary
This concludes our complete review of the Tommaso Imola. This highly capable racing bike can help riders achieve impressive results. Considering all aspects, we’ve given it a high rating of 4.6. If you’re interested in more bike information, feel free to check out our other reviews.
Lastly, if you enjoy our content, please share it with your friends. If our content has been helpful to you, you can click the email subscription button below. Thank you for your support!
