The Trek 7000 mountain bike, which was introduced in 1991, is not a particularly modern mountain bike.
It is, however, one of the better entry-level mountain bikes available. The medium price tag, combined with the ability to climb and descend some easy hills, has made it a favorite among mountain bikers.
Hello and welcome to the Best Bike Select blog. This post discusses the main features of the Trek 7000 mountain bike, what we like and dislike about it, as well as a comparison with some of the bikes currently available, which we hope will assist you in selecting the right mountain bike.
Because time is running out, let’s get started.
Features of Trek 7000 mountain bike
Aluminum frame (4.5/5)
The frame of the 1991 Trek 7000 is made of Easton 7129 E9 tapered aluminum tubing. Alpha ZX aluminum was used in the latest version of Trek 7000 in 2000.
The frame’s quality has greatly improved. Because the aluminum frame will become weak and even break after more than 5 years of use.
And the Alpha ZX aluminum frame patches on the solution to this problem, extending its life beyond ten years and allowing it to stay with you for longer if it is not a regular rough ride.
The steeper 71° head tube angle is ideal for climbing and, on steeper trails, not only brings out but improves on the benefits of a hardtail mountain bike. However, some skill is required on steep downhill trails. However, all of these are relegated to technical riding.
The Trek 7000 should be considered for its intended use, which is to ride on smaller hills with greater ease. And the frame weight is extremely light at 25.16 pounds, which is comparable to some of the current light trail mountain bikes.
Front Fork (4.2/5)
Aluminum and magnesium forks are more common in low and mid-range mountain bikes these days, which is why they are lighter. With a travel of 80mm (3.15″), this is still a good entry-level mountain bike.
The stock fork also includes a retractable dust cover to keep it clean. This is something that is difficult to notice on new mountain bikes. Perhaps the more active magnesium metal used in the fork makes it more corrosive.
The fork-linked front wheel lacks a quick release, and the barrel-axle front wheel lacks ease of installation, but I really like it. It has the potential to improve the ride’s stability. Perhaps this is why I prefer older mountain bikes as well.
Drivetrain (4.1/5)
The Trek 7000 from 1991 has a 3X7 drivetrain. The 2000 Trek 7000, on the other hand, has been upgraded to 3X9. More gears equals a greater range of shifting. It’s not just for mountain biking.
The smallest rear gear is an 11-tooth pinion, and the flywheel’s 22-tooth gears work in tandem, making it ideal for steep hills, and the ride is fast thanks to a 2x transmission ratio.
Alloy cable pull brake (3.5/5)
I’m not a fan of this type of brake, but I understand that it’s a 20-year-old design. After puddle riding, the Trek 7000’s brakes increase the braking distance. Large downhill brakes necessitate more braking force.
The power provided by your hands determines the effectiveness of your braking. It’s not very convenient, but the construction is low-cost and the braking effect is adequate.
It is still recommended that you upgrade to disc brakes, which does not come cheap, but the improved riding experience is well worth it.
Tires (4.5/5)
The width of the front and rear tires on the Trek 7000 differs slightly, front: 26 x 2.10″ Bontrager Jones AC, rear: 26 x 2.00″ Bontrager Jones AC, because the front tires provide enough grip during descents with the brakes.
Furthermore, the rear tire must provide adequate grip during normal riding or climbing. As a result, it’s an unusual but effective combination.
Commuters will appreciate the versatility of the 26″ tires, which are ideal for crowded streets or small, constantly changing terrain.
ICON Onyx handlebars (4.5/5)
Despite the fact that Trek is primarily using Bontrager alloy handlebars, the quality of the Trek 7000 handlebars is not bad.
Ergonomic design and a comfortable grip. It also employs different handlebar lengths and frame sizes to accommodate the differences between men and women.
Saddle (4.3/5)
The Trek 7000 was first used with the Trek System 2 saddle. The Bontrager FS 2000 was also used in the Trek 7000 in the year 2000. In some forums and reviews, neither saddle has received many complaints. The Bontrager FS 2000 saddle is more durable.
Trek 7000 specifications
Frame & Fork
| Frame Construction | TIG-welded |
| Frame Material | Alpha ZX aluminum |
| Fork | Answer Manitou SX, 3.15″ travel |
| Fork Material | Aluminum/magnesium, triple-clamp crown |
| Rear Shock | Not applicable |
Components
| Component Group | Mountain Mix |
| Brakeset | Avid 1D-10 brakes, Shimano Deore LX levers |
| Shift Levers | Shimano Deore LX RapidFire SL |
| Front Derailleur | Shimano Deore LX |
| Rear Derailleur | Shimano Deore XT SGS |
| Crankset | ICON Onyx, 22/32/44 teeth |
| Pedals | Bontrager Re-Entry |
| Bottom Bracket | Unspecified |
| BB Shell Width | Unspecified |
| Rear Cogs | 9-speed, 11 – 32 teeth |
| Chain | 1/2 x 3/32″ |
| Seatpost | ICON Onyx |
| Saddle | Bontrager FS 2000 |
| Handlebar Extensions | Not included |
| Handlebars | ICON Onyx |
| Handlebar Stem | ICON Onyx |
| Headset | Aheadset SAS |
Wheels
| Wheel Size | 26″ wheels |
| Hubs | Bontrager SuperStock |
| Rims | Bontrager SuperStock |
| Front Tire | Front: 26 x 2.10″ Bontrager Jones AC, Rear: 26 x 2.00″ Bontrager Jones AC |
| Rear Tire | Not Available |
| Spoke Brand | DT stainless steel, 2.0mm |
FAQ
- When was Trek 7000 made?
The earliest Trek 7000 was made in 1991 and continued until 2000.
- What size is a Trek 7000 bike?
14.5″, 16.5″, 18″, 19.5″, 20″.
- How much does a Trek 7000 weigh?
Weight: Frame, 3.88 lbs.; Fork, 1.90 lbs.; Bike, 25.16 lbs.
- What is the value of a Trek 7000?
The current value of a Trek 7000 as a used bike trade-in is about $95, less than $100.
- where to buy used bikes
In the US, you can buy used bikes from online platforms like Craigslist, Facebook Marketplace, eBay, local used bike shops, and car boot sales.
Comparison table
| Bicycle | Frame material | Wheel size | Speed Number | Price |
| Trek X-Caliber 8 mountain bike | Alpha Gold Aluminum | 27.5-29Inch | 12 | Click View |
| Trek Marlin 7 mountain bike | Aluminum | 27.5-29Inch | 10 | Click View |
| SANTA CRUZ Bronson Carbon R Mountain Bike | Carbon C | 27.5in x 2.6in | 12 | Click View |
| Schwinn High Timber Youth/Adult Mountain Bike | Steel/aluminum | 24-29 in | 7-21 | Click View |
Comparison
Trek X-Caliber 8 mountain bike vs Trek 7000
The new Trek X-Caliber 8 mountain bike outperforms the Trek 7000 in so many ways that it’s not just a good mountain bike, but also a more advanced commuter bike.
Alpha Gold Aluminum frame, 100mm travel RockShox Judy SL Fork, 29×2.35″ (XS, S, 27.5×2.35″), 1X12 speed drivetrain, Shimano MT200 hydraulic disc are included. All of these improvements add up to a selling price of around $1500.
The X-Caliber 8 is ideal for long rides because it was designed specifically for off-road use. It is all about losing weight. Despite weighing 3 pounds more than the Trek 7000, However, the design of the front fork compensates for this.
The Judy SL 100mm shock fork from RockShox features a TurnKey locking mechanism and a lighter, more adjustable air spring rather than a coil spring.
If you believe these accessories cannot be upgraded, please let us know. No, it isn’t flawless. The tires can be upgraded to a whopping 2.8″ wide for even more grip, propelling the bike forward with each pedal stroke like a throttle click.
The original fork has a travel of 100mm. It is upgradeable to a maximum of 120mm. This makes intense riding a lot more enjoyable. The Trek X-Caliber 8 mountain bike is a great mountain bike to try out if you like to ride long distances.
Learn more: Is The Trek X-Caliber 8 Worth Buying? [Trek X-Caliber 8 Review]
Trek Marlin 7 mountain bike vs Trek 7000
The Trek Marlin 7 is very stylish, and I really like the Marigold to Radioactive Red Fade. Besides the great paint color, the Trek Marlin 7 also has a clean, crisp internal alignment.
The relaxed head tube angle and comfortable ride are also the main features of the Trek Marlin 7. The same aluminum frame as the Trek 7000 is used. But the body weight is going to be about 4 lbs. in the middle. Not a very excessive weight change.
According to the official website, the Trek Marlin 7 mountain bike is a model that can compete with their high-end race bikes. Taking a closer look at its configuration, the 1X10 drivetrain, which is not very broad but crosses the line into a race model, can be interpreted as a popular version of the 3X10 Trek 7000.
The mid-range configuration of the RockShox Judy, the entry-level model for trail riding, is also consistent with the width of the Trek 7000’s tires in the 2.2-inch model.
However, the brakes are a good buy, with hydraulic disc brakes comparable to Trek’s sub-$3,000 mountain bikes. The Trek Marlin 7 is an excellent replacement for the Trek 7000, and if you like the Trek 7000, the Trek Marlin 7 will be its heir.
Learn more: Is Trek Marlin 6 Worth Buying? [Trek Marlin 6 Review]
Learn more: Is Trek Marlin 5 Worth Buying? [Trek Marlin 5 Review]
SANTA CRUZ Bronson Carbon R Mountain Bike vs Trek 7000
The SANTA CRUZ Bronson is a high-end race mountain bike, but there is a difference between the front and rear tires of the Trek 7000: [front] 29 x 2.5 inches, [rear] 27.5 x 2.4 inches.
This 150mm travel trail bike has stable geometry and a 29in front wheel that helps us plow through bomb holes and stay upright over drops, while the 27.5in rear wheel allows for quick cornering and precise split-second moves. rolls, sharp cornering turns, and more.
So it’s a super agile mountain bike with extremely loose geometry that can handle difficult climbs with ease. So you prefer faster and more agile trail riding? Try out the SANTA CRUZ Bronson Carbon R Mountain Bike.
Schwinn High Timber vs Trek 7000
If the Schwinn High Timber raced the Trek 7000 in the woods, it’s safe to say that the Schwinn High Timber would lose. The Schwinn High Timber mountain bike is preferred by commuters and casual riders because it is designed for trails and community riding.
Get back to what you thought you were doing when you first bought your mountain bike and abandon the intense mountain riding. If the Trek 7000 mountain bike had a V8 engine, it would be a V8 engine.
And, because the Schwinn High Timber has a V6, can it be ridden in the mountains? Would it have the same feel as a Trek 7000? No, not at all. As a result, your budget is constrained, and you can choose the Schwinn High Timber based on its accessories.
As a result, the Schwinn High Timber is the ideal mountain bike for commuters.
Final Verdict (4.1/5)
After 5 hours of consulting forums and related reviews, the Trek 7000’s early configuration is equivalent to a high-end version of today’s low-cost mountain bikes. I also like this mountain bike. The initial price is less than $1000, and the 2000 Trek 7000 is $1019.99.
The price is thought to be sufficient to purchase a mid-range configuration mountain bike. As a result, it’s a pleasant ride on simple woodland singletrack and commuter roads. As a result, we gave this mountain bike a 4.1 rating.
Related content: Is The Trek 7200 A Good Hybrid Bike?
References
https://jimlangley.net/bicycle_spec/92_93/7000.html
https://www.bikepedia.com/QuickBike/BikeSpecs.aspx?item=46439
